Well, it would. I don't know how well you know the paper, but it thrives on demonizing and 'splitting': on presenting the world as if there were a clear-cut divide between right-thinking people (in whom all motives are pure) and evil ones (in whom no motives are human).
I have published four novels and four books of literary criticism; I'm currently at work on a book called FOR THE LOVE OF BROKEN THINGS: MY FATHER, EDWARD GIBBON AND THE RUINS OF ROME. I teach in the Department of English and Comparative Literature at Columbia University.
(The Daily Mail feels differently
ReplyDeleteWell, it would. I don't know how well you know the paper, but it thrives on demonizing and 'splitting': on presenting the world as if there were a clear-cut divide between right-thinking people (in whom all motives are pure) and evil ones (in whom no motives are human).