Monday, November 05, 2007

The Ark of Studies

Anthony Grafton had an interesting piece in last week's New Yorker, of which this was certainly my favorite paragraph:
Fast, reliable methods of search and retrieval are sometimes identified as the hallmark of our information age; “Search is everything” has become a proverb. But scholars have had to deal with too much information for millennia, and in periods when information resources were multiplying especially fast they devised ingenious ways to control the floods. The Renaissance, during which the number of new texts threatened to become overwhelming, was the great age of systematic note-taking. Manuals such as Jeremias Drexel’s “Goldmine”—the frontispiece of which showed a scholar taking notes opposite miners digging for literal gold—taught students how to condense and arrange the contents of literature by headings. Scholars well grounded in this regime, like Isaac Casaubon, spun tough, efficient webs of notes around the texts of their books and in their notebooks—hundreds of Casaubon’s books survive—and used them to retrieve information about everything from the religion of Greek tragedy to Jewish burial practices. Jacques Cujas, a sixteenth-century legal scholar, astonished visitors to his study when he showed them the rotating barber’s chair and movable bookstand that enabled him to keep many open books in view at the same time. Thomas Harrison, a seventeenth-century English inventor, devised a cabinet that he called the Ark of Studies: readers could synopsize and excerpt books and then arrange their notes by subject on a series of labelled metal hooks, somewhat in the manner of a card index. The German philosopher Leibniz obtained one of Harrison’s cabinets and used it in his research.

4 comments:

  1. That's funny: I just now finished writing a post at my blog that was in part prompted by that passage. The Ark of Studies does sound magical!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Wonder whether the Ark of Studies influenced Vannevar Bush....

    ReplyDelete
  3. That's certainly the most interesting part of that article--but it's also the part where I thought, "oh, I'd like to know more about these particulars than the less specific misgivings that he spends much of the article discussing." Grafton is so good at making those particulars sound fascinating! I don't know, I'm more interested to hear about the new (or old) ways one approached a problem than a generalized worry. (Or he could have spent more time on the privatization of these digitization services and the expense for libraries to keep updating the software...) I remember that you give out some great assignments for students to become more familiar with the possibilities--and the constraints--of digital scans of eighteenth-century texts.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I had the same reaction as Alice: anyone who works in or around publishing has heard at least some version of the story Grafton was telling about Google, et al., while I would be a lot fewer people had ever heard of the Ark of Studies. I could have read pages and pages about those inventions alone.

    ReplyDelete